It was obviously biased in its attitude from the start.
It is evident to me that Lisa already had her mind made up and was simply interested in trying to convince her readers that she was right.
It seems to me only over the former that the state should have authority.
In the Episcopal Church, for example, marriage is one of the sacraments. This means we have the intrusion and participation of the state in a sacramental act of worship. Duke: I'm sure some considered the article a "breath of air," but they have not been well served. It didn't even deal with many of the key Bible passages. Miller's article, one could get the impression that the New Testament is silent about the subject of homosexuality, which of course it certainly is not.
Furthermore, my objections to same-sex marriage are not based solely on the Bible's teachings.
The Bible informs my opinion about this issue, but the question I think we are trying to answer is, what does God have to say about this?
The purity code was turned against women, the sick and disabled, and poor people. At great personal cost, Jesus set about in his life and ministry to welcome the unclean into his community and to his table.
He violated the purity code with his body, even finally on the cross.
They are so constantly hit over the head with Scripture, to which we must surely come. Miller called the mix of civil and religious elements of marriage an often "messy conflation of the two." I agree.Her comment, "Religious objections to gay marriage are rooted not in the Bible at all, then, but in custom and tradition ..." was offensive and uninformed.My objections to same-sex marriage are very much rooted in the Bible.On the one hand, a marriage is a civil contract between two people and the state with certain rights, responsibilities and privileges implied.On the other, it is also often an act of worship between two people before God, surrounded by prayer and support from a worshiping community and with the presence of ongoing pastoral care.Last week, Newsweek's cover story on the biblical case for gay marriage resonated on TV stations, throughout the blogosphere, and in the inboxes of many NEWSWEEK employees as Christians and nonbelievers alike sounded off on the editorial decision to run the story.Of the tens of thousands of letters we received, some argued that the Bible clearly proscribes homosexuality, while others applauded author Lisa Miller's argument on such a controversial subject.But many expressed a desire for a deeper exploration of the subject—a conversation among biblical scholars on both sides of the divide. Barrett Duke, vice president for public policy and research at the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, an agency of the Southern Baptist Convention, which addresses how Christianity should be applied to life.NEWSWEEK's Kurt Soller found two experts to do just that, e-mailing throughout the weekend (even into the third Sunday of Advent! On the pro-gay marriage side: Bill Wylie-Kellerman, a United Methodist serving as pastor at St. Read on to see how each views the Bible, what they believe Scripture has to say about gay marriage and where they think this debate will be headed (at least, in church) in the next decade.The boundaries of the community are being proscribed and protected by the code.As I understand it, the body itself becomes the image of community.